Content
Volcanic Activity Amboy Crater
thanks to Dean Philpot for this.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Obama uses 14th Amendment Ploy and Michelle Bachmann Says She'd Impeach Obama
"If he could do that, he would effectively be a dictator."
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Cinema em Agosto
Meus amores eu amo ir ao cinema! Então, eu tinha que compartilhar com vocês, os filmes que serão lançados esse mês não é mesmo?! Espero que vocês gostem do post de hoje!
Smurfs - O Filme Estreia: 05 de Agosto de 2011
Quero Matar Meu Chefe Estreia: 05 de Agosto de 2011
Sinopse: Para Nick, Kurt e Dale, a única coisa que poderia tornar o cotidiano monótono um pouco mais tolerável seria transformar seus chefes intoleráveis em fumaça. Pedir demissão não é uma opção, e assim, com a ajuda de alguns drinques além da conta e do conselho duvidoso de um um ex-presidiário trapaceiro, os três amigos elaboram um plano confuso, e aparentemente infalível, para livrarem-se de seus respectivos chefes... permanentemente.
Não se preocupe, nada vai dar certo! Estreia: 05 de Agosto de 2011
Porém, um novo inimigo chamado Parallax ameaça destruir o equilíbrio das forças do Universo, e o destino dos guerreiros e do planeta Terra estará nas mãos do seu mais novo recruta, o primeiro humano a ser selecionado para a Tropa: Hal Jordan.
Hal é um piloto de testes talentoso e audacioso, mas os Lanternas Verdes tem pouco respeito pelos humanos, que nunca utilizaram os poderes infinitos que o anel proporciona. No entanto, Hal é obviamente a peça que faltava, e além de sua determinação e força de vontade, ele tem mais uma virtude que nenhum outro membro da Tropa possui: humanidade. Com o apoio de Carol Ferris (Blake Lively), sua colega de pilotagem e namorada de infância, Hal precisa aprender rapidamente a dominar seus novos poderes e encontrar a coragem para vencer seus medos, assim ele poderá provar que não só é o único capaz de derrotar Parallax como também se tornará o maior Lanterna Verde de todos.
Professora Sem Classe Estreia: 19 de Agosto de 2011
Those Who Get It & Those Who Don't
by JASmius
Policymaking does not take place in a political vacuum. It'd be nice if we could just have Barack Obama and Harry Reid and the rest of their leftwing extremist economic terrorists arrested and force the changes in America's fiscal direction that are necessary to avoid its inevitable economic collapse. It'd be a lot nicer still if Tea Partiers could grasp that coup de tats aren't very democratic (small "d") OR Republican (upper and lower case), nor are they politically saleable to a largely apolitical voting public.
One rightwinger who understands this is Grover Norquist:
Grover Norquist says the debt ceiling deal has his blessing.
Norquist, who heads the powerful anti-tax group Americans for Tax Reform, tells Newsmax that congressional members who signed his group's "pledge" promising never to vote for a tax increase can vote for this deal.
"The deal proved that we can cut spending without trading away tax hikes," Norquist says.
He adds that the deal is no passing congressional fad, but a milestone in Capitol Hill thinking about spending and taxes.
"The deal set a new precedent: Never again will the debt ceiling be raised without a similarly sized spending cut being attached," he tells Newsmax.
The big loser in the deal?
Norquist declares unequivocally that Obama wins that title.
"Obama's internal polling must scare the heck out of him," Norquist says. "He caved on the key Republican demands: no tax hike, spending cuts equal to the debt ceiling increase."
Just so. As policy, this deal is weak tea at best; politically, it is a retreat by the forces of "Wrenching Transformation". And that lays additional foundation for their ouster in next November's election, which, if you'll recall, is the only way the country can be saved from the Third World oblivion towards which the Chicago Cherubim has it hurtling at warp speed.
In the other corner, representing the "can't see the forest for the trees with both hands and a flashlight" faction, we have Congressman Connie Mack:
Representative Connie Mack says the American people want a solution to the debt and deficit problem, not more “gimmicks and schemes,” so the Florida Republican cannot vote for a compromise that ensures continued skyrocketing debt.
“I don’t think the American people are looking for a deal or a compromise — they’re looking for a solution to the problem,” Mack said today on MSNBC’s Morning Joe. “And the problem we have is we have a deficit of about $1.5 trillion and debt at over $14 trillion. And with this plan moving forward, we ensure ourselves that we are going to have over $17 trillion in debt without solving the problem, which is cutting spending.”
Yes, Connie, we know all that; but there's this little problem of the Democrats still controlling the White House and the Senate. As the political configuration currently stands, implementing the ultimate solution to the debt problem is impossible. It will require the GOP comprehensively winning the 2012 election, and that won't happen with people like you righteously kneecapping your own party's leadership.
This next Mack quote is, you should pardon the expression, rich:
Mack said that, although he cannot vote for the deal, he believes it will pass.
“I think that Speaker Boehner has done a great job of pushing this debate, bringing it back to the principles we believe in,” he said. “But at the end of the day, I can’t vote for something that is going to ensure that we are going to have over $17 trillion in debt without a real solution to cutting spending in Washington.
So this is a costless protest vote Mack is free to cast. Riddle me this, keeds: If Boehner needed Mack's vote to pass the deal in the House, would he be carefree to engage in such cavalier grandstanding? Don't forget, folks, Boehner can get this bill passed with at least some Democrat votes. Do we want to send, much less reinforce, the message that it was the Democrats who rescued the country from a GOP-driven default? Sure it would be crap, but it's crap that the mushy-headed swing-voter will lap up like Adam Richman does barbeque sauce.
I know the policy imperatives, my friends; probably better than you do. But we can't get the country to where it needs to go outside of the political process. And that means we have to play the public relations game at a time when the other side still holds the ol' bully pulpit.
We've now got Red Barry on the run. Why on Earth do we want to throw him a propaganda lifeline?
[cross posted at Hard Starboard]
Dividing Israel - Through the U.N.
The UN and Dividing Israel
Read the Rest at John McTernan's Site
U.S. AAA Rating with Moody's still at Risk - Despite Budget Plans on the Table
"But with respect to future debt; would it not be wise and just for that nation to declare in the constitution they are forming that neither the legislature, nor the nation itself can validly contract more debt, than they may pay within their own age, or within the term of 19 years." --Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, 1789
A deal has been reached - and it does nothing but make the politicians happy.
The threat of a down-graded credit rating for the United States does not exist because of the battle over the debt limit. That is like saying that your credit rating is in danger because you haven't maxed out enough credit cards. The nation's credit rating is in danger of being down-graded, and already has been with some agencies, because of the incredible spending we are experiencing at the hands of the Keynesian economics supporting idiots in office.
As a result, both the Boehner and Reid plan, according to Moody's, does nothing for the debt limit.
Now that there is a deal, we are told that there is no tax increases, and that there is an immediate cut.
Let's think about this for a moment. The democrats, who controlled the house the last few years never came up with a budget while they had control of both houses.
Now, today, they came up with something.
"...an immediate cut of $1 trillion over a 10-year period..."
How is it an "immediate cut" is if it's taking place over ten years? Besides, these are not real cuts. They are promises to spend less over the last ten years - promises that will never be kept just as the democrats pulled in the early 80s and mid 90s.
They say we avoided a default, when we did nothing of the sort. The raise in the debt ceiling avoided them from facing real spending cuts, is all it did.
Sure, the GOP says this is a step in the right direction - but is it?
I think we would have been better off not raising the debt ceiling, forcing these bastards to prioritize spending, and cut the idiotic stuff at the bottom, and reforming entitlements.
What they have just done is literally kicked the can down the road.
The Republicans and democrats disappoint me, and have let down America.
It could have been worse, however. The totalitarian wanna-be in office, Barry Obama, would have by-passed Congress if he could.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Moody's: Neither debt plan protects the nation's AAA rating - The Hill
Top Sen. Republican: deal very close on default - Associated Press
In sales pitch, Boehner assures GOP: Deal is 'all spending cuts' - The Hill
Obama, Boehner Concede Deal's Faults - Daily Beast
Boehner Holds Call With House Republicans: Declares Victory - Gateway Pundit
Obama Announces Debt-Reduction Deal Approved by Senate, House Leaders - Fox News
Congressional leaders reach agreement to raise the debt ceiling - Yahoo News
TEMPTING ‘TO BYPASS CONGRESS AND CHANGE THE RULES ON MY OWN’ - Breitbart TV
Debt deal: Obama, Hill leaders break through - Politico
Congress pushing McConnell Obama-as-Dictator plan behind the scenes? - Renew America







