Content

Un-Re-Electable

Monday, August 29, 2011 0 comments
by JASmius









Sure, fourteen months is an eternity in politics. Sure, it's way too early in the '12 cycle to count anybody out, much less the incumbent president of the United States.



No, it's not:





The economy is so dismal that President Barack Obama will have to re-write the political history books if he hopes to win re-election, political strategists say.



The latest bad news for Team Obama: Economic growth for the second quarter was revised downward from 1.3% to a mere 1% on Friday -- far below the level of activity required to put a dent in the nation’s chronic, high joblessness.



Those slumping GDP numbers followed an economic-outlook report by the Congressional Budget Office that likely touched off alarm bells in Obama’s campaign. Despite optimistic assumptions about GDP growth, inflation, and deficit-spending, the CBO projected U.S. unemployment to be at or above 8.5% through the fourth quarter of 2012.



That means President Obama will have to earn a return engagement to the White House under virtually unprecedented circumstances. And he’ll likely have to alter his campaign strategy to do it.



Why? Because no president has ever been re-elected with an unemployment rate above 7.2%. And the one who pulled it off - Ronald Reagan in 1984 - did so because that joblessness number was plummeting beneath a roaring economic recovery produced by his supply-side economic policies. Reaganomics worked, everybody could see it, and the Gipper was freed up to run on his victory lap "Morning in America" theme.



The contrast with Red Barry couldn't be more stark. Obamanomics - which was overtly and expressly designed to roll back that quarter-century economic boom - has been wildly successful in that prosperity-destroying, job-killing, liberty-eradicating, country-weakening mission, and there isn't time to turn it around now even if more phony, debt-exacerbating statist gimmickery would even slow down the decline.



Dr. Chicago can't run on his record. So he'll employ the only strategy left to him, and the one that is nearest and dearest to his black, flinty, "Dr. Evil" heart - the politics of mass destruction:





[InsiderAdvantage CEO Matt] Towery, who served as a political strategist for former House Speaker Newt Gingrich in the 1980s and 90s, expects Obama to go sharply negative in an effort to redirect attention from the moribund economy to whether the GOP alternative can be trusted.



“There’s only one thing in politics you do when you’re that low,” he says. “You try to bloody the other guy up just as much as you can.



“I mean, it’s the only answer. I don’t care what anybody says: He can’t put enough commercials on about how hard he works or whatever. It isn’t even working in the African-American community. When Maxine Waters is out there giving you trouble, you know you’ve got problems.”



With unemployment so high, Towery says, the bottom line for Obama and the Democrats is brutally simple: “They’ve got to just bloody up whoever gets the nomination, or the party as a whole,” he says.



B.O. would, naturally, have done this anyway. But vindication of Hogzilla - which, remember, was supposed to "fix" the economy all by itself - would have given him plenty of cover for such viciousness. It would have been a secondary compliment to Hopenchange II. But it's not a viable standalone "main course" strategy. Yes, negative campaigning works, but not without a positive message to inhabit the other side of the proverbial coin. Even an incumbent has to offer SOME reason to vote for him in addition to voting against his challenger, especially as a run for re-election is a referendum on the incumbent's first term by definition. Any attempt to try to change the subject from his rotten economy after all the empty promises and strutting, self-righteous, preachy hectoring and despicable classist demogoguery will only focus public attention on the complete failure of Obamanomics all the more for how [hyuk] transparent it'll be.



There's an old saying: "What you are speaks so loudly, I can't hear what a word you're saying." The American public has already tuned out the L'il President. A year-long temper tantrum will only stiffen their resolve to take out the trash the Obamidency has become.





[cross-posted @ Hard Starboard]



Read more »

Jeez, Open Borders Rick Perry Endorsed by Former Mexican President Fox

0 comments




-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Read more »

Professor Terry J. Lovell: Super Committee Unconstitutional

Sunday, August 28, 2011 0 comments




-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Read more »

Weekend Radio Shows: From Wild Wall Street to Rising Health Care Costs

0 comments
Listen

Download

Constitution Speaker on KCAA Sat, Aug 27, 2011

Guest: Bob Rinear, Invest Yourself dot com

5 big stories of the week - August 27, 2011



5. Google Pays off Government $500 Million to Keep Federal Government From Charging them with Knowingly Posting Illegal Canadian Pharmacy Advertisements



4. 5.8 Earthquake Strikes East Coast



3. Steve Jobs Steps Down as CEO of Apple



2. Gadhafi Defeated, Rebels Occupy His Compound in Tripoli



How do you spell his name? Jeez!



Rebels fight Loyalists in Tripoli



1. Hurricane Irene and the Great Media Hype



------------------------------------------------



Nuts and Nuggets:



Nut: Representative Maxine Waters: “The Tea Party can go straight to Hell.”



Nugget: Jered Weaver of the Angels of Anaheim in press conference after media person offers that he left money on the table in his new 5 year extension to his contract with the Angels: “How much more do you possibly need?” Weaver asked, drawing a huge roar from the assembled fans. “I’ve never played this game for money purposes. I play for love and championships.



“If ($85 million) is not enough to take care of my family and other generations of family, then I’m pretty stupid.”

....................................................................

Listen

Download

Constitution Speaker on KCAA Sun, Aug 28, 2011

Rising Health Costs with Bob Fredericks of Fredericks Benefits


5 big stories of the weekend




5. NYC Mayor Bloomberg: No Prayer at New York 9/11 Memorial



4. Mexican Troops and Federal Agents Raid Casinos After Arson Attack



. . . and the Mexican President says it's all the fault of the U.S.



3. Federal Agents Shut Down Gibson Guitars



2. Irene Slams Into New York, Obama Declares State of Emergency in 9 States, D.C., and Puerto Rico



Storm Irene Massive Flooding



New York City Transit Shut Down by Storm - First Time Ever!



After dire forecast, Irene falls short of the doomsday Predictions - Yes, there has been flooding, and some damage, but. . .



Little Damage Seen



Irene Packs Little Wallop



1. 150 Bodies found in Libya, Gadhafi rumored to be in Zimbabwe



------------------------------------------------



Nuts and Nuggets:



Nut: Gore: Global warming skeptics are this generation’s racists



Nugget: Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker with Mark Belling: As a state we are doing well. We've gone from a $3.6 B deficit to a $300 M surplus. Wauwatosa public schools, where my two sons go, have improved their outlook. Basically, all WI schools are doing better by saving money due to reforms. They're now hiring more teachers, lowering classroom size, since they don't have to have this collective bargaining. Collective bargaining is not a right but an expensive entitlement. Now, teachers are hired or fired on merit, not on tenure or seniority.



The WEA trust- union run health plan- is now saving HUGE amounts due to there being no collective bargaining. We have, literally, example after example. This saved money is able to go back to the classroom.



Republicans have to stay on point and be positive! Don't be frustrated, make your point over and over and over, how you'll make it work. Stay on point! Don't lash out! Our candidates got outspent 3-1 in the recalls but we stayed on point. Mitch Daniels did the same thing in IN and the voters re-elected him. Results matter!

Read more »

Shh, Don’t Tell Anyone. Obama Is Increasing The Cost Of Going To School.

0 comments
By J.J. Jackson



I have a secret to tell you. But you cannot tell it to anyone if I tell it to you. Do you understand? Because I am super serious about how secret this secret is.



Ok, good. Now come closer. No, no, closer. No one else can overhear this.



Now you are too close. Back up a bit. Ok, that’s good.



Here is the secret which you cannot tell anyone else. President Obama is raising the cost of your kid going to school.



What? President Obama raising costs on families? That cannot be right can it? I mean, he is all for the “little people” isn't he?



Well, as hard as it is to believe, it is true. In fact in the Penn Hills School District , where I live just outside of Pittsburgh , the cost of a school lunch is going up by $0.50 this year. And all because of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act passed by Congress and signed by President Obama in 2010.



Because of this legislation, lunches served in the Penn Hills schools will go from $1.75 each to $2.25. And while that may not seem like a lot of money, it is part of a bigger problem that most Americans are blissfully unaware of. But first, a little math lesson.



That $0.50 a day is a seemingly paltry $2.50 a week for the parents of a child that use the school lunch program. In a month it comes to $10 more one must pay for lunches. Over the course of a 9 month school year it is $90 in total if a student takes advantage of buying their lunch from the school every day. And that is if you have just one kid in school.



Now like I said, this is part of a larger problem which plagues America; the hidden cost of government. Every time government regulates something and mandates a certain action be taken it adds costs. For a family of four in Penn Hills, this hidden cost of government do-gooderism is stripping $180 from their wallets because the President and Congress decided that the meals our children eat in school needed a little bit more oversight.



Now think about how this microcosm projects onto the larger world of government regulation. If something as simple as government mandating what is in school lunches, because apparently we as parents are too dumb to decide such matters on our own, can increase your bill for just living by almost $200 in a year what are bigger and more sweeping regulations adding to our cost of life?



How many thousands of regulations are there that the federal government has passed? What if just ten of them added $200 each per year to our household expenses? Those ten regulations equal $2,000 per year more we as citizens must pay just to live. And when government is so good at covering its tracks, would you even know?



Maybe you think that, despite the evidence already presented, that there is no way that there could be ten regulations out of thousands that add these sorts of costs to your daily lives. Ok then, take for example gasoline taxes. The federal government adds $0.184 to every gallon. But you may not know that because it is not printed as an individual line item on your receipt. If you fill up once a week, fifteen gallons each time, that is $143.52 per year. If you are a two car household where both parents fill up once a week that become $287.04 a year.



Still think we cannot find just 10 federal regulations that add $200 each per year to you life?



What about taxes on businesses? Think that businesses pay those? Oh, you foolish soul!



Nope. Whether they be business income taxes or the business's share of your Medicare and Social Security, you pay somewhere around, to be very conservative, 20% extra every time you buy something. If you spend just a miniscule $500 per month, $100 is flying out of your wallet to pay for those regulations and taxes. Per year this is a sum of $1,200.



And you thought politicians like Barack Obama care about you?



Still think that regulations do not cost you dearly? So how much to you really pay every year because of government and its hand? Do you really know? Do you really want to know? And if you found out, could you handle the truth?

======================================================

J.J. Jackson is a libertarian conservative author from Pittsburgh , PA who has been writing and promoting individual liberty since 1993 and is President of Land of the Free Studios, Inc. He is the Pittsburgh Conservative Examiner for Examiner.com. He is also the owner of The Right Things - Conservative T-shirts & Gifts The Right Things. His weekly commentary along with exclusives not available anywhere else can be found at Liberty Reborn.
Read more »

Eight Is Enough

0 comments
by JASmius









Should Sarah Palin finally take the plunge and run for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination? I think the answer can be found in this Des Moines Register blog post:





Eight Reasons Palin Should Run









  • 1. BELIEF IN HERSELF: “She believes that she could win,” said Republican Greg Hudson, 29, of West Des Moines, who writes the blog 1007 East Grand.



  • 2. LIKES THE LIMELIGHT: “She loves to compete, and this is the ultimate competition,” said Doug Gross, an Iowa GOP politics insider.



  • 3. STEALTH HELP: The work that a grass-roots group called Organize4Palin is doing on an unofficial, volunteer capacity in Iowa and other states rivals what some campaigns have done with paid staff, said Shane Vander Hart, 39, of Pleasant Hill, who writes the blog Caffeinated Thoughts.



  • 4. FIRING UP THE BASE: Palin would motivate the Iowa GOP base and excite those uninspired by the current field, Hudson said.



  • 5. TEA PARTY POWER: If there will be a time the tea party movement picks the nominee, this could be the year.



  • 6. MONEY MAGNET: SarahPAC has reported impressive totals ($1.67 million this year, the Open Secrets website shows) without putting much effort into it, Vander Hart said.



  • 7. ALREADY VETTED: “She has effectively weathered the media onslaught,” said tea party supporter Brett Rogers of West Des Moines.



  • 8. WINNING MESSAGE: “She could win the nomination based on message quality alone,” said Dave Funk, 53, who was Iowa co-chairman of Sportsmen for McCain-Palin in 2008 but says he is remaining neutral this cycle.


Eight Reasons She Shouldn’t Run





  • 1. HIGH NEGATIVES: Palin generates negative scores in polling that are sky-high, and that can take millions of dollars to counter, Iowa strategists said.



  • 2. QUESTIONABLE STAYING POWER: Winning a nomination is not a national race — it’s about getting 40,000 or so Iowans to support you in the caucuses, and then tackling turnout in the other early states.



  • 3. INDECISION A TURN-OFF: Palin is the Brett Favre of politics, keeping everyone guessing about her plans.



  • 4. ALREADY A KINGMAKER: Palin can alter the presidential race, and thus American history, in the role she’s already in: spokeswoman for a conservative movement, several Iowans said.



  • 5. HALF-TERM GOVERNOR: The fact that Palin quit the Alaska’s governor’s office in the middle of her first term will be underscored in a race that includes Texas’ longest-serving governor.



  • 6. ALLERGY TO REPORTERS: The live-by-the-sword Palin sometimes finds herself at war with the media. But she did a better job of working with the press during her daylong visit to the Iowa State Fair, Iowa Republicans noted



  • 7. ATTACKS ON FAMILY: The national media are ruthless in their scrutiny and criticism of Palin, and several Republicans in Iowa said they think that has taken a toll.



  • 8. WHERE’S HER TEAM?: Palin has reached out to few people who are professionals at organizing, even as she mocks them at every step, strategists in Iowa told the Register.


What do the eight pro reasons have in common? In a word, narcissism. It would all be about her, not what was best for the country, her party (which doesn't need her to fire it up), or the movement for which she purports to speak. It would be a selfish, self-indulgent ego trip, not unlike the incumbent she'd be seeking to challenge.



Why? Look at the eight reasons she shouldn't run. They're all practical, all convincing, and all undeniable. The fact of the matter is, Sarah Palin has been "Quaylized," and she's done some of it to herself (i.e. by resigning as Governor of Alaska barely half-way through her lone term). She couldn't win. She'd be the twenty-first century Barry Goldwater, with all the disastrous implications it would have down-ticket. Sure, it'd be unfair and irrational, but that's the nature of modern politics. What she stands for is popular, in the ascendancy, and must be done, but she is the worst possible vehicle for that message. Like it or not, the Obamedia accomplished its mission: they destroyed her as viable presidential timbre.



And that's assuming she could even win the Republican nomination, which I frankly doubt. The most likely outcome of her entrance into the race this late would be to kneecap Rick Perry and rescue Mitt Romney from a second-consecutive submarining.



Sarahcuda knows this. If she had ever intended to run, she wouldn't have dithered until her niche was filled by someone else equally as capable of filling it and much more capable of taking out The One.



She'll stay on the sidelines, if she truly believes her own rhethoric.





[cross-posted @ Hard Starboard]



Read more »

Rising Health Costs, and the Danger of Obamacare today on Constitution Speaker Radio on KCAA 1050 AM

0 comments


Tune in at KCAAradio.com at 2pm Pacific for the show that is unlike any other on the air. Today's Guest, the man behind Fredericks Benefits on the rising cost of health care, and the danger of Obamacare.
Read more »